tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post6552627139636969790..comments2023-07-05T05:08:15.635-05:00Comments on Destructive Interference: Academic IntegrityFordhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00931092903743408537noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-31413936016886012682010-03-22T00:39:00.757-05:002010-03-22T00:39:00.757-05:00Hey,
When ever I surf on web I never forget to vi...Hey,<br /><br />When ever I surf on web I never forget to visit this website[url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/lose-10-pounds-in-2-weeks-quick-weight-loss-tips].[/url]Lots of good information here fordlikethecar.blogspot.com. I am sure due to busy scedules we really do not get time to care about our health. Let me present you with one fact here. Recent Scientific Research points that nearly 50%Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-76505931681297650182010-02-09T17:51:38.390-06:002010-02-09T17:51:38.390-06:00Opulently I to but I dream the collection should a...Opulently I to but I dream the collection should acquire more info then it has.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-89063109242490965442010-02-03T11:30:17.628-06:002010-02-03T11:30:17.628-06:00Genial post and this post helped me alot in my col...Genial post and this post helped me alot in my college assignement. Say thank you you on your information.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-3627488874107337622008-04-03T02:14:00.000-05:002008-04-03T02:14:00.000-05:00"if scientists can show that an irreducibly comple..."if scientists can show that an irreducibly complex system can be observed evolving without intelligent help"<BR/><BR/>Ah. Require the scientists to make an observation that might happen after 1000 lifetimes. Given what "starting point"? No wait - you should not have used that starting point - please start over again. Wise strategy. But...<BR/><BR/>Perhaps a scientist merely has to come up Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-69178287755913314732008-03-05T08:38:00.000-06:002008-03-05T08:38:00.000-06:00Rob, I've been thinking about your comment. Here's...Rob, I've been thinking about your comment. Here's what I got:<BR/><BR/><I>What we don't know so incalculably outweighs what we do know about almost anything.<BR/>As humans, I don't believe we are capable of employing pure science.<BR/>We are children, wildly waving our arms and legs after jumping off the high dive, scrabbling for a point of reference in the free fall.</I> <BR/><BR/>I agree with Fordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00931092903743408537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-32312876026341691292008-02-29T10:59:00.000-06:002008-02-29T10:59:00.000-06:00Haeckel's embryos is a better example: an influent...Haeckel's embryos is a better example: an influential scientist propped up a flawed theory with faked evidence. That's scandalous to say the least. Of course, his work was discredited more than 100 years ago. No one should be teaching it as anything other than an example of how not to be a scientist. There are plenty of valid observations and explanations to work with.<BR/><BR/>As I said overAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-87625716140982346452008-02-29T08:47:00.000-06:002008-02-29T08:47:00.000-06:00Let me try this again:Thanks Mudpuppy for visiting...Let me try this again:<BR/><BR/>Thanks Mudpuppy for visiting. I had fun reading your very extended blog as well. I think I'll run back over there in a minute as a matter of fact...<BR/><BR/>Mike:<BR/><I>Zealots will undoubtedly point to such corrections and insist that the entire theory is therefore flawed. Some will say that all evidence in favor of evolution is faked. These people are Fordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00931092903743408537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-78320571314716702752008-02-29T08:38:00.000-06:002008-02-29T08:38:00.000-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.Fordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00931092903743408537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-84271490368025043412008-02-28T12:52:00.000-06:002008-02-28T12:52:00.000-06:00Ford - A well written piece. Congrats on getting i...Ford - A well written piece. Congrats on getting it published. And thanks for stopping by the blog!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-39623352256965509402008-02-28T10:04:00.000-06:002008-02-28T10:04:00.000-06:00Of course! No one wants to propagate bad informat...Of course! No one wants to propagate bad information. Hoaxes and fakes should be deleted from the curriculum. Flawed experiments should be revisited. Our teachers need continuing education, and our students need updated textbooks. Absolutely.<BR/><BR/>(Zealots will undoubtedly point to such corrections and insist that the entire theory is therefore flawed. Some will say that all evidence inAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-17268821966710786972008-02-28T09:27:00.000-06:002008-02-28T09:27:00.000-06:00Okay-the peppered moth issue may not be as locked ...Okay-the peppered moth issue may not be as locked as I thought. I should have checked more closely before publishing-I'll give a deeper look into that when I get some more time.<BR/>fordFordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00931092903743408537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-68659815575618675382008-02-28T09:16:00.000-06:002008-02-28T09:16:00.000-06:00Rob-I'm going to have to think for a while before ...Rob-<BR/>I'm going to have to think for a while before I respond to your question. Thanks for the comment and the interest.<BR/><BR/>Mike-<BR/>Thanks for stopping by. I'm currently reading:<BR/>Theobald's "29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent" at The Talk.Origins Archive, and I must admit I am quite underqualified. I think I've already come to a better Fordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00931092903743408537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-34796245973954613842008-02-28T08:23:00.000-06:002008-02-28T08:23:00.000-06:00We have varying degrees of confidence about all fi...We have varying degrees of confidence about all fields of science. Everything we know is "belief", and some of what we believe is certainly speculation. That doesn't diminish its value. In order to summon more than a passing glance, such an idea must first conform to everything we already know -- no small challenge. And in order to survive, it must withstand the scientific process.<BR/><BR/>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-62000672475434636822008-02-27T09:57:00.000-06:002008-02-27T09:57:00.000-06:00"This debate has spiraled out of control because b...<I>"This debate has spiraled out of control because both sides have been employing folk-tales to advance their beliefs"</I><BR/><BR/>What we don't know so incalculably outweighs what we do know about almost anything. <BR/>As humans, I don't believe we are capable of employing pure science.<BR/>We are children, wildly waving our arms and legs after jumping off the high dive, scrabbling for a pointrobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02867727744152010789noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-36555167163964529852008-02-27T08:26:00.000-06:002008-02-27T08:26:00.000-06:00Thanks all for the comments. Thanks Bradley for th...Thanks all for the comments. <BR/><BR/>Thanks Bradley for the correction. I must have read over the thing twenty times and never noticed that error. <BR/><BR/>I was really hoping to get into a debate on this with someone. I wish now I had added my email address to the piece in the paper, but I was not sure if they were going to publish it. <BR/><BR/>As for the Second Law of Thermodynamics issue, Fordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00931092903743408537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-67472702752619572212008-02-26T21:12:00.000-06:002008-02-26T21:12:00.000-06:00Well said, Ford (though the contractions make this...Well said, Ford (though the contractions make this writing tutor cringe). I agree with much of what you have written there and am pleased to see the News Herald had the wisdom to publish it.<BR/><BR/>However: I am still inclined to look at the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics as a sufficient standard to compare to the general nature of depreciation in our world. Consider that not only does our world Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00229981018680117757noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-15883547309225171162008-02-26T09:04:00.000-06:002008-02-26T09:04:00.000-06:00I agree with Lauren. You just very literately put...I agree with Lauren. You just very literately put things into words that some of us don't know how to. Awesome! Thank you.Laurahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16738204772441725156noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-77810359422492332962008-02-25T22:16:00.000-06:002008-02-25T22:16:00.000-06:00speak for yourself lauren. I am a Christian AND a...speak for yourself lauren. I am a Christian AND an idot!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6735541.post-4079922165682358612008-02-25T10:26:00.000-06:002008-02-25T10:26:00.000-06:002-Quit the lowbrow sucker-punch rhetoric of brandi...<I>2-Quit the lowbrow sucker-punch rhetoric of branding creationists or I. D. proponents as illiterate bigots, and start policing the religious extremism that is being displayed by the supposedly enlightened side.</I><BR/><BR/>i think you've managed to succesfully brand yourself both a creationist and highly literate, and for this i say, "well done". thanks for saying, with a considerable amountlauren (mf) showshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02439389444275733865noreply@blogger.com